Argument
Essay: Banning Books
By
Liam McAllister
Imagine having one of your basic rights
taken away. Banning books seems like it would happen in some dystopian future,
not a democratic country like ours. All across the United States of America,
books are banned in schools for “questionable” themes, which takes away young
adults’ right to choose the books that they read. This is wrong for many
reasons. First, censorship violates the First Amendment right to free speech. Also,
many people worry mistakenly that the young adults reading these books will
mimic the characters that are making bad choices like smoking or drinking or
self-mutilation. Perhaps most importantly, teens feel less alone when they read
about difficult issues that they’ve experienced in their own lives. Censorship
can deny them that therapy.
In the story “Indian
Education” in a banned book, The Lone
Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven by Sherman Alexie, a character named Junior
gets bullied, so he fights back: “I punched him so hard that my knuckles and
the snow made symmetrical bruises on his face.” Although this book has a lot of
violence like this in it, reading violent books doesn’t necessarily influence
teenagers to become violent. The article “Darkness Too Visible” by Meghan Cox
Gurdon in The Wall Street Journal
states, “Reading about homicide doesn’t turn a man into a murderer; reading
about cheating on exams won’t make a kid break the honor code.” A common
argument is that young adults will do exactly what’s in the book that they’re reading,
but the same thing could be said about readers of all ages.
It helps kids to
read about difficult problems that they’ve experienced, because they feel
comforted that they’re not alone, and it can help them cope with their problems.
The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in
Heaven has been banned for its portrayals of violence and drug and alcohol
abuse. If you have experienced these issues in your own life, seeing your life
in a book can make you feel less ashamed and less invisible, and maybe even help
you see your life more clearly . In “Darkness Too Visible” Gurdon argues that
novels, “validate the teen experience, giving voice to tortured adolescents who
would otherwise be voiceless.” It is important for kids to know that they are
not alone and to learn about the unpleasant as well as the positive.
When people ban
books to protect kids from edgy themes, they think they’re helping them, but
they are not. When you “protect” a kid from the knowledge of violence, bullying,
sex, drugs etc., you are putting them in a vulnerable position of ignorance. In
the article from the SIRS database, “Can Book Censorship Save Our Children and
Their Innocence?”, the author Jake Rich argues, “though discussions of teenage
sexuality are generally considered taboo, it is something that most kids begin
to think about as soon as they hit puberty.” This fact is true of many subjects
and experiences. The truth is adolescents encounter many dark and challenging
things from an early age: violence, discrimination, poverty, etc. This is
something that people will not be able to stop no matter how hard they try. Kids
can benefit from reading books with these themes because they could gain
tolerance and understanding and possibly change the world.
Books shouldn’t be banned because they
have themes of violence, sex, and drugs . If young people are allowed to read
books about challenging issues, then they would understand those issues better
and learn how to fix them, and the world would be a better place. Banned books
can help teens become more open-minded to difficult topics and expand their
knowledge. People shouldn’t be trying to ban books with such subjects, instead
they should spread awareness about them. If people were more aware of the
difficult issues affecting our society, then there would be less
discrimination, less gun violence, and people would have more understanding and
empathy for others.
Works Cited
Alexie, Sherman. The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in
Heaven. New York: Grove Press Books, 1993. Print.
Cox Gurdon,
Meghan. “Darkness Too Visible.” The Wall
Street Journal 4 June, 2011: 1-5. Print.
Rich, Jake. "Can Book Censorship
Save Our Children and Their Innocence?." University Wire. 7 Oct.
2014: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 18 Dec. 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment